THE DIMENSIONAL SELF: A New Map for the Neurodivergent Mind

The conversation around the HUMAN MIND is changing. For decades, neurological variations like Autism, ADHD, and OCD were viewed through the narrow lens of pathology—as deficits to be corrected or cured. This perspective is giving way to a more expansive and empowering framework: the NEURODIVERSITY PARADIGM. This fundamental shift reframes neurological differences not as disorders, but as natural and valuable forms of human diversity, much like the biodiversity that enriches our planet.1

At the heart of this new understanding is a critical insight: the idea of a "pure" neurotype—someone who fits neatly into one diagnostic box—is largely a myth.15 The scientific reality is a complex and interwoven spectrum of traits. This recognition invites us to move beyond rigid labels and explore a more holistic, dimensional model of the self. By bridging the empirical world of neuroscience with the symbolic wisdom of archetypal systems, we can create a new map for navigating the neurodivergent experience—one that honors both our challenges and our innate potential.

The Unaccommodating World: Neurodivergence in the Modern Workplace

While the neurodiversity paradigm offers a more enlightened perspective, the reality for many neurodivergent individuals, particularly in the workplace, remains one of significant struggle. The modern workplace, largely designed for a narrow range of neurotypical functioning, often fails to accommodate, understand, or support those who think and process the world differently. This failure creates profound personal and economic consequences.

A Crisis of Misunderstanding and Underrepresentation

The statistics surrounding neurodivergent employment paint a stark picture of systemic barriers and missed opportunities.

• Unemployment and Underemployment: The unemployment rate for neurodivergent adults is estimated to be 30% to 40%, roughly eight times the rate for individuals without disabilities.16 For autistic adults, the figures are even more severe, with some studies suggesting an unemployment rate as high as 85%. Even for those with college degrees, underemployment is a significant problem.17 Adults with ADHD are less likely to be employed full-time and earn, on average, 17% less than their neurotypical peers. Meanwhile, the chronic and disabling nature of OCD contributes to high rates of occupational impairment, with one study finding that 25% of severe cases lead to unemployment.
• Workplace Barriers and Discrimination: For those who are employed, the workplace is often inhospitable. A recent survey found that 41% of neurodivergent employees face workplace challenges daily.3 Common barriers include sensory overload from noise and lighting, difficulties with conventional social interaction, and rigid work structures that stifle creativity.18 This lack of support has tangible consequences; over half of neurodivergent employees have taken time off work due to burnout and unaddressed mental health issues.3 Discrimination remains a pervasive fear and reality. One in five neurodivergent employees reports experiencing harassment or discrimination at work, and 65% fear discrimination from management. This fear is often justified, as personal accounts detail experiences of bullying, demotions, and wrongful termination following a diagnosis.8

The Socio-Economic Ripple Effect

The failure to integrate and support neurodivergent talent is not just a social issue; it is an economic one. The underemployment of this population costs the U.S. economy billions of dollars in lost productivity and increased reliance on public safety-net benefits. This represents a staggering waste of human potential.

Conversely, embracing neurodiversity is increasingly recognized as a competitive advantage. Neurodivergent individuals often possess extraordinary skills in areas like pattern recognition, mathematics, and innovative problem-solving. Companies like Microsoft, SAP, and Hewlett Packard Enterprise that have reformed their HR processes to access this talent pool report significant gains in productivity, innovation, and quality improvement.2 Closing the employment gap for disabled workers could boost the U.S. GDP by as much as $25 billion.

The Need for a New Language: Converging on Science and Symbolism

The immense gap between the potential of the neurodivergent workforce and their current reality highlights a critical failure in our models of understanding. The clinical language of the pathology paradigm, with its focus on deficits and disorders, is insufficient. It pathologizes natural variations in cognition and fails to provide a framework that honors individual strengths or offers practical guidance for navigating a world not built for them. This leaves many feeling misunderstood, alienated, and without a functional "user manual" for their own minds.

This is precisely why a synthesis of science and symbolism is not just an intellectual exercise, but a practical necessity. Science provides the crucial "what"—the neurobiological basis for a diagnosis, the validation of a lived reality, and the evidence needed to secure accommodations. It gives us the language of impairment. However, it often falls short of providing a personal "how" or "why"—a map for living authentically with a particular neurological wiring.

Symbolic and archetypal systems, while not scientifically predictive, offer a complementary language of potential. They provide frameworks that can help individuals reframe their challenges not as flaws, but as the "shadow" side of a unique gift. They offer a vocabulary of strategy and authority that can feel deeply empowering. By integrating the objective truths of science with the subjective meaning-making of symbolism, we can construct a more complete, holistic, and ultimately more useful understanding of the dimensional self.

The Scientific Case for a Spectrum

The argument for a dimensional model of neurodivergence is built on a solid foundation of biological and clinical evidence. Science now shows that the lines between Autism, ADHD, and OCD are far more blurred than previously understood.

• SHARED BIOLOGY: Research reveals a profound biological overlap. There is a massive shared genetic liability between Autism and ADHD, with some estimates of overlap as high as 72%. Furthermore, all three conditions often show similar impairments in the brain's white matter, the neural "cabling" that facilitates communication between different brain regions. This suggests a common underlying vulnerability in the brain's fundamental architecture.
• CLINICAL OVERLAP: High rates of co-occurrence are the norm, not the exception. This clinical reality often leads to challenges like DIAGNOSTIC OVERSHADOWING, where one diagnosis masks the symptoms of another, preventing a complete and accurate picture of an individual's needs. This is compounded by social factors like MASKING—the exhausting process of hiding neurodivergent traits to fit in—which is particularly common in women and a primary reason for the phenomenon of late diagnosis.

An Archetypal Language for Lived Experience

Symbolic frameworks like HUMAN DESIGN, the GENE KEYS, and PSYCHOLOGICAL ASTROLOGY offer a new, non-pathologizing language for self-exploration. While these systems are not tools for clinical diagnosis, they serve as powerful maps of the psyche, helping individuals frame their traits in terms of archetypal potential rather than deficits.

• Neurotypes as Operating Systems: HUMAN DESIGN "Types" function as resonant metaphors for different cognitive styles. The MANIFESTING GENERATOR, for example, with its multi-passionate, non-linear energy, serves as a powerful archetype for the ADHD experience of interest-based attention and hyperfocus. The PROJECTOR, defined by its non-sustainable energy and need for recognition, mirrors aspects of autistic social processing and the risk of burnout. These archetypes provide a framework for understanding one's unique energy and strategy for navigating the world.
• A Narrative for the Journey: The GENE KEYS' "Golden Path" offers a symbolic narrative for the process of self-discovery, particularly for those diagnosed later in life.19 It maps a journey from the

"SHADOW"—the struggle of being misunderstood and masking one's true self—to the "GIFT," which represents the self-acceptance and creative expression that emerges from living authentically.27 This reframes personal challenges as potent opportunities for growth.

Key Insights for Moving Forward

This synthesis of science and symbolism points toward a more holistic and personalized path forward. It redefines the concept of a "pure form" not as a clinical state to be achieved, but as an ARCHETYPAL BLUEPRINT OF POTENTIAL—the authentic, unconditioned self that these systems help us to uncover.19

• FOR INDIVIDUALS: Adopt a Bifocal Lens. Embrace a dual approach to self-understanding. Use the scientific lens for obtaining accurate diagnoses, securing accommodations, and understanding the biological basis of your challenges. Simultaneously, use the symbolic lens of archetypal systems for personal meaning-making, self-acceptance, and exploring your unique potential.
• FOR CLINICIANS: Integrate and Adapt. The high rate of co-occurrence necessitates integrated treatment models that address multiple neurotypes at once. Therapies must be adapted to be neuro-affirming, such as modifying CBT for autistic individuals by using concrete language and incorporating special interests.
• FOR RESEARCHERS: Deepen the Dimensional Inquiry. The field must continue to move beyond rigid categorical studies. LONGITUDINAL STUDIES, which track individuals over a lifetime, are critical for understanding how these conditions develop and interact. Research must also become neuro-inclusive, involving neurodivergent individuals in the design and interpretation of studies to ensure relevance and respect.
• FOR SOCIETY: Build a More Inclusive World. The ultimate goal is to create environments—in our workplaces, schools, and communities—that recognize cognitive difference as an operational edge, not a deficit. By challenging outdated stereotypes and valuing the unique perspectives that neurodivergent individuals bring, we can build a world that is more innovative, compassionate, and human by design.

Referenced Sources

• 14 Cognassist. (n.d.).

A brief history of “Neurodiversity”.

• 37 Neurodivergent Insights. (n.d.).

ADHD, Autism, and OCD | Understanding the Overlap and Differences.

• 10 Neurodiversity @ Caltech. (n.d.).

Neurodiversity: A Brief History.

• 15 PubMed Central (PMC). (n.d.).

Examining overlap and homogeneity in ASD, ADHD, and OCD: a data-driven, diagnosis-agnostic approach.

• 38 NEUROQUEER. (n.d.).

AUTISM & THE PATHOLOGY PARADIGM.

• 39 Disabled World. (2025, May 31).

Autism Paradigms: Neurodiversity vs. Pathology Explained.

• 40 Psychiatry Online. (2020).

Shared or Distinct Alterations in Brain Structure in Disorders Across the Impulsivity-Compulsivity Spectrum.

• 36 La Concierge Psychologist. (n.d.).

Autism, ADHD, and OCD: Understanding the Connections, Differences, and Overlaps.

• 5 The Autistic Advocate. (n.d.).

What is Neurodiversity?

• 41 Simply Psychology. (2025, April 3).

ADHD, Autism, & OCD: Similarities & Differences.

• 42 ADDitude. (n.d.).

Autism, ADHD, and OCD May Have More In Common Than Previously Thought.

• 43 Autism Speaks. (n.d.).

Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD).

• 44 AANE. (2024, May 2).

OCD Treatment Considerations for Autistic Individuals.

• Bristol Menopause. (n.d.). Neurodivergence in Women: Why Late Diagnoses of ADHD and Autism are so Common and the Role of Hormones.
• Columbia Library Journals. (2024, March 12). Shifting Paradigms.
• 45 Oxford Academic. (n.d.).

Policing a neurodiverse world: Lessons from the social model of disability.

• 46 Mental Health America. (n.d.).

Unmasking as a late-diagnosed autistic person.

• 47 Wikipedia. (n.d.).

Human Design.

• Verywell Mind. (n.d.). Is Human Design The Next Enneagram?
• 20 Marketing Yourself. (n.d.).

Introduction to Gene Keys for entrepreneurs.

• Inkblot Astrology. (n.d.). What Is Psychological Astrology? | A Guide.
• Wikipedia. (n.d.). Psychological astrology.
• Brainz Magazine. (n.d.). Embracing The Power Of Neurodiversity And Multi-Potentiality – A Personal Journey Through ADHD And Human Design.
• 48 Clinical Leader. (n.d.).

The Future Of Clinical Trials Is Neurodiverse.

• 19 Gene Keys. (n.d.).

Gene Keys Intro.

• 49 ResearchGate. (n.d.).

The Clinical Characteristics of ADHD and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Comorbidity.

• 50 Inkblot Astrology. (n.d.).

What is Psychological Astrology?

• 3 Workplace Insight. (n.d.).

New research claims there is a lack of support for many neurodiverse employees.

• 2 Harvard Business Review. (2017, May–June).

Neurodiversity as a Competitive Advantage.

• 16 ACTE. (2024, May).

Research Roundup: Neurodiversity in the Workplace, Student Financial Aid Eligibility, and Guided Pathways.

• American Enterprise Institute. (n.d.). Embracing Neurodiversity at Work: Unleashing America's Largest Untapped Talent Pool.
• Entrepreneur. (n.d.). What Is the Economic Impact of Hiring Autistic, Neurodivergent and Disabled People?
• 51 NEUROQUEER. (n.d.).

Autism and the Pathology Paradigm.

For more information, read our Research Reports on Neurodivergence: